/sfg/ - Spaceflight General

[Anonymous No.16181044]

Starship Testing Activities Edition

Previous - >>16178867

[Anonymous No.16181048]

>>16181044
TLDR for OP picture is May 20-22 is testing activities of Starship from 8AM to 8PM, NOT flight activities doe.

[Anonymous No.16181052]

you keep mispelling Space Flight

[Anonymous No.16181057]

>>16181052
or as I've taken to calling it, space plus flight

[Anonymous No.16181060]

>>16181057
that would be a good one yeah

[Anonymous No.16181062]

>>16181044
Kindve a boring OP ngl

[Anonymous No.16181063]

>>16181062
this is the calm before the storm (WDR)

[Anonymous No.16181067]

>>16181062
Yeah not much going on. I wouldve had to do a screenshot twitter thread if I wanted to mention the recent Boeing delay, and it was only a delay of a few days so not really thread worthy.

[Anonymous No.16181069]

>>16181067
The only other recent thing than that wouldve been first 21st flight F9 but like do you guys REALLY want an F9 thread in this day and age? I personally thought not with how much everyone complains about even stream links of F9 being posted so I chose to do this.

[Anonymous No.16181070]

>>16181062
ayo frfr

[Anonymous No.16181073]

>>16181067
You can make it about anything retard. Why not make it Big Gemini you dumb retard?

[Anonymous No.16181076]

>>16181073
Im sorry I didnt think of it. Last time I made a thread that wasnt current news someone also complained about that. Im confused as to who to listen to, is it big current news = current news OP, and small current news = random spaceflight OP?

[Anonymous No.16181078]

>>16181076
make it not suck or don't make it at all

[Anonymous No.16181079]

>>16181078
Ok I will do this in the future then.

[Anonymous No.16181086]

>>16181044
There is already an /sfg/ >>16178834
This thread is spam

[Anonymous No.16181088]

>>16181076
you NEVER think of ANYTHING

[Anonymous No.16181090]

>>16181086
tranny flight general?

[Anonymous No.16181096]

>>16181088
How about I make another thread on the mechanics of stability in an underice Europan colony and then get no replies about it and get told Im stupid and to just post current news with nobody answering again. Or I could try making an Ice Giant Probe edition and nobody discusses what could be done/found for the mission in terms of orbital trajectory or length of mission. Or maybe a Ceres Lander thread where everyone again doesnt care. I gave up trying original ideas for a reason, everyone either didnt care to discuss it or told me to do current news only. I guess Ill go back to doing what I did before and continue getting yelled at no matter what I do.

[Anonymous No.16181100]

>>16181096
or you could not make threads, because you seem to be pretty bad at it

[Anonymous No.16181104]

Helmet reveal for Polaris Dusk

[Anonymous No.16181106]

>>16181096
I never get yelled at when I make the bread. in fact, people compliment me and say it's a cool OP. if no one engages, that also good. that means it doesnt suck nuts

[Anonymous No.16181107]

>>16181100
Take back the reigns then I only started being the OP because thread splitting would constantly occur whenever I didnt make on topic threads for example the last thread split when I didnt make it. If it splits again youre getting my OPs again. Until then Im off duty.

[Anonymous No.16181110]

>>16181106
Im the only one saying 'good edition OP' because you covered for my shift that thread btw so you know. They are good threads but thats only because the other OPs are the ones that make >>16181086

[Anonymous No.16181111]

>>16181110
>>16181106
Also if nobody engaging is good then most of my threads go like that.

[Anonymous No.16181115]

Alright shows over back to your usual posting

[Anonymous No.16181120]

Hear me out

[Anonymous No.16181123]

>>16181120
We will not be using SLS for anything in this general. AND THAT INCLUDES GOON MATERIAL

[Anonymous No.16181124]

>>16181120
lego vagina, what brick with they think of next?

[Anonymous No.16181127]

>>16181123
STS* (I think)

[Anonymous No.16181138]

>>16181107
shut the fuck up nigger

[Anonymous No.16181139]

>>16181120
go back to twitter

[Anonymous No.16181140]

>>16181120
truthful is that you

[Anonymous No.16181142]

no king rules forever

>Ukraine’s 125th Territorial Defense Brigade — stretched thin along a roughly 27-mile stretch of the Kharkiv region’s border with Russia — used reconnaissance drones to monitor, daily, how Moscow was steadily building up forces for a possible attack. But the morning it happened, May 10, the brigade lost all its video feeds due to Russian electronic jamming.
Its Starlink devices — satellite internet the Ukrainian military relies on for basic communication — failed, the first time it was knocked out completely for them since Russia’s invasion in February 2022.
>“We were left at a certain point completely blind,” said a drone unit commander in the brigade. The Post agreed to identify him by his call sign, Artist, in keeping with Ukrainian military protocol.
>“This was the biggest problem, we didn’t see how they were moving, we only worked through radio or through phones where they still worked,” Artist, a 53-year-old sergeant, said. The drone feeds, he said, “simply disappeared.”
>Within days, the Russians had captured — for the second time — some 50 square miles of territory along the border, capitalizing on a moment of particular vulnerability for Ukraine’s military.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/05/17/kharkive-defenses-ukraine-russia-reinvasion/
https://archive.is/AXPbG

[Anonymous No.16181143]

>>16181076
A cool picture is best imo, does t matter if kts current events
Somebody is always going to complain whatever you do so I would t worry about it too much as long as its a pic that is on topic

[Anonymous No.16181144]

>>16181142
also starlink doubled in price

[Anonymous No.16181145]

Sussy Launch System, RizzSkibidi-25 Engine

[Anonymous No.16181147]

>>16181096
A op poc or edition topic not getting discussed in the thread isnt unusual and doesnt really matter either
The edition is more about distinguishing threads (i.e. a name) than actually a topic for the thread

[Anonymous No.16181150]

>>16181147
Ok so I just need to jingle keys in the OP for you all and then discuss my actual questions and situations I wouldve used for OP in the thread?

[Anonymous No.16181153]

It's over... Mars will be wiped clean.

[Anonymous No.16181155]

https://www.delgazette.com/2024/04/03/nasa-blaze-star-could-soon-reappear/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtRAaSrML50

[Anonymous No.16181156]

>>16181153
Earth sends their regards

[Anonymous No.16181167]

>>16181153
>wiped clean.
no, it'll be like the end of Total Recall, blue skies on Mars after all the subterranean ice caverns melt

[Anonymous No.16181181]

https://spacenews.com/helium-leak-further-delays-starliner-crewed-test-flight/
>According to industry sources, the leak was detected during the May 6 countdown that was scrubbed because of an unrelated valve issue with the Atlas 5 Centaur upper stage. It was unclear if, had the valve worked normally, the launch could have continued.

[Anonymous No.16181219]

>>16181181
cursed vehicle

[Anonymous No.16181236]

>>16181181
Boeing and valves man

[Anonymous No.16181239]

>>16181236
Centaur issue lands at Lockheed though.

[Anonymous No.16181241]

>>16181239
All the same shit.

[Anonymous No.16181250]

>>16181181
>TOTALLY UNRELATED valve, the rocket that launches the space capsule isn't actually relevant to the space capsule at all!!
Holy cope

[Anonymous No.16181266]

SPEHS

[Anonymous No.16181272]

>>16181266
>Burns up on reentry

[Anonymous No.16181273]

BepiColumbo is struggling...

[Anonymous No.16181274]

>>16181044
>>16176320
wait wtf?
I don't often come here, but I vividly remember that during trumps precidency there was actual discussion and argumens weither Dragon2 or Starliner will be the first to fly humans to the ISS...
That thing still hasn't flown? Jesus christ.

[Anonymous No.16181275]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMHpOUYE_iw
>Tower Two Breaks Ground! Starbase Flyover Update 41

[Anonymous No.16181278]

>>16181274
it’s been to orbit, almost died trying,
had to redo that test because NASA wasn’t happy,
and now it’s been waiting to send up Butch and Suni, but has found literally every excuse under the sun to slip, recycle, and scrub

[Anonymous No.16181282]

>>16181275
Orthanc

[Anonymous No.16181298]

>>16181275

[Anonymous No.16181299]

>>16181298

[Anonymous No.16181300]

>>16181299

[Anonymous No.16181301]

>>16181300

[Anonymous No.16181303]

>>16181301
comfy

[Anonymous No.16181305]

>>16181303

[Anonymous No.16181306]

Holy shit, the awful soundcloud dubstep. It's embarrasing at this point.
https://youtu.be/vOg49BVhU40?si=MgA_4-jbg2ZEpuC8&t=585

What happened to the SOVL of the 2016 Interplanetary Transport System soundtrack?

[Anonymous No.16181320]

>>16181181
>>16181278
Let's say they're delaying on purpose. Why?

[Anonymous No.16181330]

>>16181266
Artemis 1 was kino, and I am grateful for SLS for making it happen

[Anonymous No.16181344]

>>16181320
Well I doubt they’re delaying on purpose

[Anonymous No.16181359]

will moon alcohol taste different given the lower amount of gravity that could interact with the fermenting/distillation process? do alcohols age different due to gravity? could one tell if an batch of whiskey was made on earth, mars, moon, or in orbit?

[Anonymous No.16181372]

>>16181359
>do alcohols age different due to gravity?
no idea
we've never had a spin station to test it

[Anonymous No.16181378]

>>16181359
I wonder if a LEO distillery would be economically viable. Rich people pay a lot for weird rare luxury boozes, and this would be one of the weirdest and rarest on the market.

[Anonymous No.16181381]

>>16181378
it would definitely not be economically viable unless musks wildest fantasies about starship become reality (they never became reality with falcon)

[Anonymous No.16181383]

Dyson sphere candidates.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.02927

[Anonymous No.16181385]

>>16181383
We could have images of the mech from the Dyson sphere program video game placing conveyor belts and we would still just assume it's dust in front of the star.

[Anonymous No.16181387]

>>16181378
https://chilledmagazine.com/top-ten-most-expensive-spirits/
ignoring the bottles that are expensive because of diamonds or w/e it seems a realistic price is around 100-200k for a liter (maybe even 750ml). though given that it would require the design and creation of a micro automated distillery that works in space that also doesn't leak and then a way to return the distilled alcohol who knows how much that would cost.

[Anonymous No.16181389]

>>16181383
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18941
this one too

[Anonymous No.16181397]

>>16181299
Are they building "Starfactory" because they want an indoor area to work, or are they confident enough with their current designs to begin moving towards mass production?

[Anonymous No.16181401]

>>16181385
this is the fundamental problem with looking for any kind of biosignature or dyson scale technosignature. Anything promising will be endlessly discounted as natural phenomenon, even if there is no known process or combination of processes that could produce it

the robertson panel (and the condon report) and their consequences have been a disaster for the human race

[Anonymous No.16181413]

>>16181303
I want to know who makes these tiny homes. I might want one in the future.

[Anonymous No.16181415]

>>16181387
Huh. So the unit economics should be able to be made to work out even without Starship but rather with F9 launches today. Big question, as you note, is whether there's enough margin left to pay off the capital cost of the orbital distillery, bearing in mind that, as the most luxury of luxury goods, there's going to be a brutal cost curve and hence upper limits on how much space hooch you'll be selling to recoup that outlay. #1 on the list is on there because of the supply constraint and has a market cap of $75M. Tens of millions of dollars might buy the distillery itself, but probably not the ancillary vehicles you need to get stuff to and from it. That's actually way closer to viability than I was expecting.

[Anonymous No.16181421]

>Need to use special "trace element certified" permanent markers to write on anything that is going to fly.
>They probably cost $30 each
And people wonder why old space is so expensive.
Can't have that marker scribble containing .000002% magnesium now can we.

[Anonymous No.16181427]

>>16181415
thinking about it more there should be some actual value in space distillery technology so it might even be able to get government funding. seems something more well suited to be connected to a commercial space station though probably with that zero g medicine production tech

[Anonymous No.16181429]

>>16181052
>>16181057
It's NewSpeak you ThoughtCriminal scum!

[Anonymous No.16181431]

>>16181383
Why do professional career astronomers entertain themselves with this science fiction? This doesn't belong in a journal.

>>16181421
Aerospace grade markers

[Anonymous No.16181443]

>>16181427
Yeah, sharing capital costs on power, stationkeeping, getting stuff up there and back down, etc with other LEO manufacturing (and, if part of a manned CSS, astronaut missions) would make lots of sense. At this point, I start wondering about whether the profit margin of space hooch can beat out space drugs, though, especially on a per unit mass (or maybe volume?) basis. But 'LEO manufacturing is so awesome that even profitable industries are getting crowded out by ultra-profitable industries' seems like a good place to be!

[Anonymous No.16181445]

>>16181397
the first one mainly

[Anonymous No.16181471]

>>16181421
>y-you don't understand maaann, those regulations are written in blood!

[Anonymous No.16181522]

>>16181320
They might wish to avoid killing astronauts at a time when public opinion of Boing! is at a historical low and news organizations would certainly capitalize on the existing interest in safety failures, something which might even lead to regulatory intervention in the operations of the company.

[Anonymous No.16181536]

>>16181522
I kind of thought about that, but that would imply they know something (bad) about starliner that NASA don't.

[Anonymous No.16181557]

>>16181383
> convergent evolution to spinchaddery
never doubted it

[Anonymous No.16181559]

>>16181052
Space Fox General

[Anonymous No.16181563]

>>16181536
Could simply be a risk management strategy. Even if they don't know of any flaws, they know there are still risks at a time where the company is becoming risk adverse.

[Anonymous No.16181571]

>>16181559
so true

[Anonymous No.16181642]

waiting two more weeks again I guess.

[Anonymous No.16181648]

the third button is "learn how fucking valves work"

[Anonymous No.16181655]

>>16181648
kek, this is good. Valves are legitimately hard though, especially if you're working with something like helium.

[Anonymous No.16181671]

>>16181648
Go back to rebbit with this decade old fucking meme

[Anonymous No.16181677]

>>16181671

[Anonymous No.16181686]

>>16181677
Nobody is defending Boeing you strawmanning dickface. Point out in that message where I was defending Boeing explicitly, and Ill tell you now there is no implicit defending of Boeing either.

[Anonymous No.16181690]

What happens in a timeline where NASA doesn't manage to court allies in the chairforce and gets disbanded after Apollo?

[Anonymous No.16181711]

>>16181690
Who cares thats not the current timeline

[Anonymous No.16181717]

>>16181711
Okay, what happens if Musk makes a starship which can deliver 150T to LEO? (Also not current timeline)

[Anonymous No.16181720]

>>16181144
Global Mobile is service for travelling between countries. Given the demand must be high for this service, it makes sense to charge more for niche business case use

[Anonymous No.16181723]

>>16181690
NASA never had "allies" in the Air Force. They were forced into an unwilling partnership by the DoD and NRO.

I doubt there's a timeline where NASA gets fully disbanded, since big government agencies are exceptionally hard to kill, but if NASA did get scaled back hard after Apollo it could kill off the Mariner, Pioneer, and Viking programs. The Soviets would rack up the firsts they'd be expected to with the Salyut program and would push harder for successful missions to the outer planets. They never had much luck originally thanks to how trash their computer systems were, but if they're not dumping Rubles into Buran to try and match the Shuttle program they might be able to address that. A few big Russian wins with some Mars or Jupiter probes could relight the old Sputnik fears and then we're almost back where we were in the 1960s. Or, without Buran the Soviets focus on getting a working heavy lifter and then try for their own lunar program in the late seventies or early eighties.

[Anonymous No.16181741]

>>16181677
kek
>>16181686
>>16181671
seething

[Anonymous No.16181745]

just don't reply

[Anonymous No.16181771]

>>16181383
no advanced civ would create dyson spheres unless they're impossible to get to or attack. it just paints too big of a target on your back.

[Anonymous No.16181790]

>>16181771
*vaporizes you from 1000 ly away*

[Anonymous No.16181794]

I wonder if the janny likes spaceflight

[Anonymous No.16181822]

https://twitter.com/Astra/status/1791476898008273202
>We've been hard at work delivering on multiple Astra Spacecraft Engine customer programs and wanted to share a peek into our largest vacuum chamber during a test firing using Krypton.

Still alive, somehow

[Anonymous No.16181831]

>>16181181
So the Centaur had a valve issue but the capsule ALSO had a leak in the helium system. Boing does it again.

[Anonymous No.16181848]

https://twitter.com/NatReconOfc/status/1791861413863989260
>Launch update: Now targeting no earlier than Tuesday, May 21, for the launch of NROL146 on a SpaceX Falcon 9 from Vandenberg Space Force Base

Tomorrow's 3 AM Falcon 9 launch just got delayed. I can only imagine your disappointment

[Anonymous No.16181854]

>>16181305

[Anonymous No.16181876]

>>16181848
I booked my day off ork to watch this.

[Anonymous No.16181907]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79e8Y2Mgq-0
>Did Elon Musk Just Solve The Nuclear Threat From Russia And China?

[Anonymous No.16181912]

>>16181907
>title posed as a question
The answer is always "no". Not giving it a view.

[Anonymous No.16181920]

>>16181912

[Anonymous No.16181970]

Going to kms

[Anonymous No.16181971]

>>16181970
why are (((they))) covering this up

[Anonymous No.16181994]

>>16181970
Fake news, read what people who look with their own telescopes say
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/905912-uranus-neptune-colors/

[Anonymous No.16182007]

[Anonymous No.16182033]

>>16181994
I haven’t considered this. Neptune looks super blue through my telescope

[Anonymous No.16182044]

>>16182033
Yes and therefore it would look blue if you were on one of its moons. Distance wouldn't change anything. The 'achshually its nearly the same color as Uranus' is bullshit.

[Anonymous No.16182056]

>>16182044
wrong

[Anonymous No.16182062]

>>16182056
eat my ass.

[Anonymous No.16182065]

>>16181299
Never realized from the ground how fucking massive starfactory is

[Anonymous No.16182067]

>/sfg/ - ass eating general

[Anonymous No.16182081]

>>16181970
That's a Jewish lie

[Anonymous No.16182085]

https://x.com/rookisaacman/status/1791845941013569616

[Anonymous No.16182088]

>>16182085

[Anonymous No.16182090]

>>16181090
spaceflight is a key transhumanist topic.
immortality, space travel, body modification and artificial intelligence are the four cornerstones of transhumanism

[Anonymous No.16182091]

>>16182088
https://x.com/Dr_ThomasZ/status/1791860143052693769

[Anonymous No.16182100]

>>16182085
>>16182088
>>16182091
Common NASA W

[Anonymous No.16182101]

Caring about hubble is reddit tier. It's an ancient pos. Design a monolithic 9m telescope for starship if you care about astronomy.

[Anonymous No.16182102]

>>16182100
seems like the opposite

[Anonymous No.16182110]

>>16182085
>>16182088
Jared is so based it’s unreal. Sometime I think he might be more impotent to spaceflight than Musk himself

[Anonymous No.16182114]

>>16182110
Are you deluded? Jared is a sucker like Yusaka jap. Elon is the undispuited GOAT

[Anonymous No.16182115]

>>16182091
Every career NASAfag says this only AFTER they have left any sort of position of power or influence. Not buying it anymore. No redemption for Bolden, none for Jim, and certainly none for Dr. Zurb here. Losers, all of them.

[Anonymous No.16182122]

[Anonymous No.16182123]

[Anonymous No.16182125]

[Anonymous No.16182132]

>>16182115
doing so during would probably destroy their career

[Anonymous No.16182133]

>>16182122
planetes

[Anonymous No.16182138]

>>16182091
So the hubble mission is fully canned?
All I saw was the npr email thing with boomers being upset but I didn't know that actually canned it

[Anonymous No.16182141]

>>16182115
They were only following orders.

[Anonymous No.16182143]

>>16182114
Jared went to orbit, Elon didnt. Who's the bigger retard? I'll give you a hint (picture relevant)

[Anonymous No.16182146]

>>16182122
>israel
kek

[Anonymous No.16182148]

>>16182114
musk is a master of none who just wants to be called chief engineer. Jared actually knows more about spaceflight than musk kek

[Anonymous No.16182151]

>>16181062
Are you kidding? Eddie Treviño is the man

[Anonymous No.16182153]

>>16181401
We got burned pretty bad by that canals on Mars thing

[Anonymous No.16182155]

>>16182143
It's not about sending yourself to orbit, thats showboating. It's about sending your race to orbit.
>>16182148
What's with all this shilling for Jared I-suck-men? Does he pay you good?

[Anonymous No.16182157]

>>16182155
its a Musk hater, I doubt he gives a shit about Jared

[Anonymous No.16182161]

[Anonymous No.16182164]

look at him go!

[Anonymous No.16182167]

>>16182164
honestly why didnt they go with a design looking more like this? it would be actually aero stable on reentry unlike real shuttle.

[Anonymous No.16182175]

[Anonymous No.16182177]

>>16182155
>What's with all this shilling for Jared
Common sense
>>16182157
I like musk. I just like Jared and John carmack more

[Anonymous No.16182193]

>>16182167
/sfg/ isn't ready to hear this but the fully reusable dolphin sex shuttle would have absolutely fucked and we're lucky NASA didn't try to actually build it.

[Anonymous No.16182194]

>>16182193
would have been*

[Anonymous No.16182198]

>>16182177
you are an absolute faggot

[Anonymous No.16182200]

https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1791989950713635188

[Anonymous No.16182204]

>>16182167
>>16182193
to answer your question, that kind of geometry may have made sense when they thought the orbiter would have its own big internal fuel tanks but the move away from that more or less invalidated the concept. our shuttle wasn't aerodynamically perfect but it got the job done without really having any more fuselage than it needed to.

[Anonymous No.16182212]

>>16182177
this! literally this! john carmack is making his ai son in the woods right now like henry david through, mecha based mode

[Anonymous No.16182215]

>>16182200
What's the point of stacking if it wont launch till June?

[Anonymous No.16182229]

>>16182200
I'm still amazed that these idiots arent bankrupt yet.

[Anonymous No.16182233]

>>16182229
>glowies ever going bankrupt
top kek

[Anonymous No.16182236]

>>16182215
Stack and destack twice more and then maybe a WDR okk

[Anonymous No.16182248]

>>16181120
? The pussy is backwards
>>16181127
You're correct

[Anonymous No.16182250]

>>16182193
it would have bankrupted nasa well before it ever flew if they'd actually tried it. i say this as a dolphin sex fan.

[Anonymous No.16182262]

>>16182250
you’re jsur making shit up

[Anonymous No.16182264]

whatever happened to Skylon?
not even their fucking page on wikipedia has had any meaningful updates in years kek
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skylon_(spacecraft)&action=history

[Anonymous No.16182267]

>>16182250
>bankrupted
NASA isn't a business. They have however much money Congress says they have

[Anonymous No.16182270]

>>16182264
VC bait scheme

[Anonymous No.16182279]

>>16182193
>>16182250
>>16182262
>>16182267
the shuttle was supposed to debut in 1977 or 78 but Columbia only rolled off the production line in 1979 and it wasn't till 1981 that STS-1 actually took off.
the orbiters were meant to have a two week turnaround between flights but they could barely manage two months.
now think of how absolutely fucked the giant hydrolox orbiter would have been.

[Anonymous No.16182288]

>>16182264
never trust a brit with anything spaceflight related

[Anonymous No.16182290]

>>16182264
they got snatched up by DARPA or something (source: random twitter faggot)

[Anonymous No.16182292]

[Anonymous No.16182311]

>>16181383
so faster than light space travel is impossible

[Anonymous No.16182314]

>>16182311
FTL is possible, dyson spheres are just a fun project to work on.

[Anonymous No.16182318]

https://youtu.be/ebGilmgDFiQ?t=104
Can someone make a webm out of this? Holy shit it looks awesome. maybe two

[Anonymous No.16182324]

>>16182318
at 3:08 I think you can see multiple starlink sats wizzing by lmao

[Anonymous No.16182327]

https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1791993536600007133
Big meteor in Portugal earlier today

[Anonymous No.16182329]

>>16182327
meteor or space junk?

[Anonymous No.16182332]

>>16182200
Stack and destack and stack and destack and stack and destack

[Anonymous No.16182334]

>>16182329
You can never be 100% sure just eyeballing things from a phone, but it looks like it's moving significantly faster than it would be if it was hitting air at just orbital velocity. A Dragon reentry would take a lot longer to cross the sky than this thing does.

[Anonymous No.16182336]

>>16182329
meteor, you can tell because of how fast it was moving
no space junk comes in that fast

[Anonymous No.16182339]

>>16182318

[Anonymous No.16182341]

[Anonymous No.16182343]

[Anonymous No.16182346]

>>16182339
Thank u so much for these

[Anonymous No.16182355]

>>16182318
look at all that pollution its dumping into the atmosphere. all just to launch some commercial satellites to musk can get even more money for himself, what a total waste.

[Anonymous No.16182363]

>>16182355
I had to do a dubble take when I saw that. What the actual fuck?

[Anonymous No.16182369]

We stacks again

[Anonymous No.16182390]

>>16182369
Subhuman craft on the left. Aryan beast on the right

[Anonymous No.16182417]

predictions for when they lose the vehicle this time?
I'm going with "loss of control during transsonic" because that is the funniest possible outcome, but I think "hitting the ocean as intended" is more likely if they can maintain attitude control on orbit and during reentry

[Anonymous No.16182440]

>>16182417
I think booster will landly softly, but not softly enough where they're confident enough to attempt a catch on the next flight. Ship will have the roll fixed but will still burn up sometime after loss of signal and before reacquisition

[Anonymous No.16182470]

>>16182440
no way fag, I'm calling it, they don't lose signal the whole way down

[Anonymous No.16182486]

>>16182470
yeah, starlink will firm it.

[Anonymous No.16182500]

>>16182470
i have the feeling that with starship being a tube, the plasma hole won't be as big as something like the shuttle

[Anonymous No.16182504]

>>16182334
awful cameraman

[Anonymous No.16182507]

>>16182500
It's already wider than the shittle and extra wide at the flaps

[Anonymous No.16182521]

Musk is in Indonesia.
Possible spaceflight implications?

[Anonymous No.16182525]

>>16182229
less money and time has been used for this than SLS
substantially less

[Anonymous No.16182540]

>>16182521
its for starlink

[Anonymous No.16182545]

>>16182525
starship has cost at least 10 billion and counting by musks own lowball figures.

[Anonymous No.16182547]

>>16182545
And that's still cheaper than SLS, a rocket based on 80s hardware.

[Anonymous No.16182548]

>>16182521
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1792129896690639175

[Anonymous No.16182562]

>>16182334
wtf is this? I was thinking Dragon because everyone is set up and ready to watch it, but you just said it would probably be travelling slower than a meteor

[Anonymous No.16182571]

>>16182229
SpaceX will be nationalized before they go bankrupt anon

[Anonymous No.16182575]

>>16182562
>I was thinking Dragon because everyone is set up and ready to watch it
Are they? To me it looks like someone was filming a party or get-together and got lucky.

[Anonymous No.16182593]

>>16182547
SLS cost 11.8 billion according to NASA, who don't lowball their figures like SpaceX does. Like I said Starship cost at LEAST 10 billion so far (Musk said just running Starbase was 2 billion a year even before IFT1), and the real figure is probably 1.5x or even 2x that because SpaceX does creative accounting.
Musk is a genius visionary who is making this all happen through force of will, but SpaceX being an order of magnitude cheaper than competition is actually a myth. Hasn't been true since Falcon 9. Falcon heavy was meant to be a trivial strapping together of Falcon boosters and cost 1.5 BILLION and over half a decade. I don't care because burning VC and government money is a moral good, but they certainly arent doing anything on the cheap.

[Anonymous No.16182595]

>>16182593
I see that lying is natural to you.

[Anonymous No.16182596]

>>16182593
>according to NASA
lmao

[Anonymous No.16182597]

>>16182595
I didnt mention orion did I?

[Anonymous No.16182601]

>>16182597
Learn to read, retard.

[Anonymous No.16182605]

>>16182597
SLS isn't used for anything else so separating them doesn't make too much sense
in any case you lied about the number anyway, its over 20 billion just for SLS

[Anonymous No.16182607]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1792129896690639175

[Anonymous No.16182608]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1792129080965681450

[Anonymous No.16182610]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1792103408763322582

[Anonymous No.16182621]

>>16182610
new baby receptacle next to elon?

[Anonymous No.16182624]

>>16182607
polan...

[Anonymous No.16182625]

>>16182607
oh boy cant wait for all the psychos from indonesia to start shitting up the internet even more. i already have to deal with enough of them as is.

[Anonymous No.16182641]

Why is he meeting with all these world leaders? What's his end game?

[Anonymous No.16182649]

>>16182641
meeting every other world leader except Biden
lmao

[Anonymous No.16182684]

>>16182610
>meeting president casually wearing t-shirt
what's the opposite of a humiliation ritual?

[Anonymous No.16182690]

test123

[Anonymous No.16182692]

did my test go through?

[Anonymous No.16182722]

>>16182607
But won't help the people of Gaza

[Anonymous No.16182726]

>>16182684
Victory Lap

[Anonymous No.16182741]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0H-I-jMhoA
After 21 months, New Shepard resumes crewed flights
T-30:00

[Anonymous No.16182754]

>>16182741
...Why is he fingering it like that?

[Anonymous No.16182764]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb3a0EgAaIk
Clear's up

[Anonymous No.16182767]

>>16182741
>>>/n/
Not spaceflight.

[Anonymous No.16182768]

>>16182764
She shouldn't have to see this...
BO streams are really unbearable with how up their own ass they are (despite launching suborbital tourist rides).

[Anonymous No.16182780]

>>16182741
It'd be funny if this one fucks up too

[Anonymous No.16182782]

>people still on the crew walkway at t-10 minutes

[Anonymous No.16182786]

>>16182782
Yeah, and people are still on the tarmac as my plane taxis around. The casual safety practices are a good sign for the future of rocketry.

[Anonymous No.16182795]

>>16182782
it was a fake t-10 minutes anyway. the FAA needs to ban planned holds. it's basically fraud to get your youtube viewership count up.

[Anonymous No.16182802]

I'm not trying to sound racist, but is my impression that Blue Origin is far behind SpaceX accurate? If so, why is Blue Origin behind?

[Anonymous No.16182809]

boogity

[Anonymous No.16182812]

What if they forgot to shut off the engine and just shot the rocket deep into space?

[Anonymous No.16182813]

min-qute

[Anonymous No.16182819]

yikes

[Anonymous No.16182821]

>lost a chute
see you guys in 2 years

[Anonymous No.16182822]

>chute failed to deploy
see you in another 2 years, blue

[Anonymous No.16182824]

I told you it's not that easy in parachutetry

[Anonymous No.16182830]

>>16182821
>>16182822
hivemind

[Anonymous No.16182840]

How many times did spacex do test for parachutes for dragon?

[Anonymous No.16182853]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1792193136770597020

[Anonymous No.16182855]

Not a good day for blue

[Anonymous No.16182857]

I am gonna be so pissed off if these pointless suborbital joyrides kill someone and lead to a regulatory clampdown on all spaceflight.

[Anonymous No.16182862]

>>16182802
>If so, why is Blue Origin behind?
Because only people who go to work at BO are the ones who want to take it easy

[Anonymous No.16182870]

wtf no one told me there was a launch today? is this spacex live legit?

[Anonymous No.16182872]

>>16182870
this is why it's important to rely on verified launch streamers like usui clear

[Anonymous No.16182874]

>>16182872
i am watching the official spacex channel, i am asking whether its a replay or not, this all so sudden, marcus house never said anything about launching today and i just watched him yesterday

[Anonymous No.16182879]

>>16182874
It's that crytospam nonsense again, ignore it.

[Anonymous No.16182880]

>>16182857
I unironically believe that is Jeff's goal here

[Anonymous No.16182881]

>>16182521
Feronickel for stainless steel.

[Anonymous No.16182882]

>>16182874
ah its a retarded spacex [LIVE] channel

[Anonymous No.16182885]

>>16182862
so relatable

[Anonymous No.16182891]

>>16182885
she spin?!

[Anonymous No.16182898]

https://x.com/StephenClark1/status/1792214617189417362
>Blue Origin's main parachutes are made by Airborne Systems, the same supplier for main chutes on SpaceX's Dragon, Boeing's Starliner, and NASA's Orion spacecraft.
it's over

[Anonymous No.16182901]

>>16182898
Was it parachute problem or deployment issue

[Anonymous No.16182942]

>>16182874
>i am watching the official spacex channel
lmao no you aren't, kid. Next time click on the channel name.

[Anonymous No.16182948]

>>16181383
amazing to think that someone who came up with such a stupid idea could make such amazing vacuum cleaners

[Anonymous No.16182964]

>>16182722
not muh hecking terrorinos!

[Anonymous No.16182968]

>>16182764
>有人宇宙飛行
>宇宙飛行
stupid bitch

[Anonymous No.16182970]

>>16182767
based

>>16182802
>I'm not trying to sound racist
start trying

[Anonymous No.16182975]

>>16182948
Someone who sucks is amazing at making something that sucks? Seems like a logical progression.

[Anonymous No.16182991]

>>16182167
Cargo bay requirements probably limited the design.

[Anonymous No.16183004]

>>16182649
Biden has used the FAA to make his feelings about SpaceX and Musk known.

[Anonymous No.16183006]

> Dyson spheres are bad because, because...look they just ARE, O.K.!!!!

[Anonymous No.16183013]

>>16183004
basically every agency

[Anonymous No.16183019]

>>16183006
>>16182975
I'd like to point out that this was intended to be an obvious joke
>>16182948

They're not the same person and I hate that there's any danger of confusion at all with Freeman Dyson who is incredibly smart and accomplished (but unfortunately not a racist).

[Anonymous No.16183035]

>late may
>Not even WDR


Spx bros... Whats taking so long....

[Anonymous No.16183038]

>>16183035
We just had a mini-WDR... theres also testing acitivities from 20-22 as you can see in OP which IS the WDR itself,

[Anonymous No.16183055]

>>16182874

[Anonymous No.16183069]

Elon should start a company to research human suspended animation. /sfg/ could skip the juiceless months and years between major happenings and SpaceX could apply the results to spaceflight.

[Anonymous No.16183070]

>>16183035
They need to finish the investigations, modofy the rocket, wdr, static fire, get a new license. July/August

[Anonymous No.16183089]

>>16183069
fuck that. just accelerate to .99c.

[Anonymous No.16183099]

Retard here.
Is the earth actually flat?

[Anonymous No.16183100]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw80qBV7LBc
RFA One first stage static fire

[Anonymous No.16183110]

>>16183099
you betcha. flatter than a can of mackerel.

[Anonymous No.16183126]

>>16183099
more or less. look up geoid

[Anonymous No.16183129]

https://x.com/rfa_space/status/1792264625687257305

[Anonymous No.16183132]

>>16183100
https://twitter.com/rfa_space/status/1792264625687257305
>First fire! We have successfully kicked off the hot fire campaign for our first stage at SaxaVord_Space. We hot-fired a total of four Helix engines, igniting one by one at four second intervals. All engines ran simultaneously for 8 seconds with a total hot-fire duration of 20 seconds. The test ran flawlessly through start-up, steady-state and shutdown.
>With this hot fire, we were able to demonstrate that we can nominally operate and control our first stage and all its systems, as well as a cluster of Helix engines.
>RFA and our incredible team are marching steadfastly on towards our first test flight, not only in Scotland but also in Augsburg, Portugal and Sweden. Special thanks to our partners at SaxaVord_Space for their support at all levels.

There are five engines on the first stage. I wonder if only firing four of them was the plan

[Anonymous No.16183139]

>>16183132
cock shame

[Anonymous No.16183153]

>>16183089
kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.16183177]

>>16183153
>wahhh daddy elon i don't wanna go fast, put me on a trajectory so low-energy that i take a nap the whole way wahhhhh

[Anonymous No.16183187]

>Now published. These show lunar lander blast is 4-10x worse than we had believed.

>“Erosion rate of lunar soil under a landing rocket, part 1: Identifying the rate limiting physics.”

https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1j6tY4L-YmnYn

>“…part 2: Benchmarking & predictions.”

https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1j6NG4L-YmnYb

No paywall for 50 days.

https://x.com/DrPhiltill/status/1792266572817445321

Probably important

[Anonymous No.16183191]

>>16183187
oh boy reading multiple articles about dirt my favorite

[Anonymous No.16183195]

>>16183191
Just do what most do and read the conclusion.
>The erosion rate equation developed in the companion paper has been partially validated by comparison with optical density of the blowing dust during an Apollo landing. Integrating the erosion rate during vehicle descent to the lunar surface requires a soil model that tells how the soil becomes more resistant to erosion with increased compaction below the surface. Soil models based on thermal inertia of the lunar soil measured by LRO Diviner and on Apollo core tube and drill core data produce excellent fits to the blowing dust, but this requires a parameter that tells how cohesive energy of the soil increases with compaction. That parameter has been crudely constrained here by imagery of the post-landing erosion depths, but the permissible range still varies by a factor of three. This results in a factor of 2.6 uncertainty in the total mass of eroded soil blown during each Apollo landing. This can be improved by measuring k directly in the laboratory. The ultra-fines fraction of lunar soil is also not well-constrained, and this produces another +53% to 27% uncertainty in the total eroded soil. The new estimate of eroded soil during Apollo landings is 11 to 26 t, which is 4 to 10 times higher than prior estimates. This suggests that soil blown during lunar landings can cause much worse damage to surrounding hardware than previously recognized.

[Anonymous No.16183210]

>>16183195
so lunar cargo landers would have to land pretty far away from other equipment or have some kind of shielding (natural or artificial)
perhaps a landing pad would solve that as well

[Anonymous No.16183215]

The third whistleblower was killed by Boeing

[Anonymous No.16183222]

>>16183195
chatgpt, shorten this to one sentence

[Anonymous No.16183227]

>>16183222
the new simulation model is different from the old one. neither is empirical, both based on assumptions. it's just more nasa busybody scientist blowing our tax dollars "studying" instead of doing

[Anonymous No.16183231]

>>16183222
>Despite limitations in soil property data, the new estimate of lunar soil eroded during Apollo landings is significantly higher than previous values.
So basically the first sentence here >>16183187

[Anonymous No.16183233]

>>16183215
https://nypost.com/2024/05/17/us-news/boeing-whistleblower-john-barnetts-suicide-note-revealed/
Uhh...guys?? I think the Boeing whistleblower browsed /sfg/

[Anonymous No.16183234]

>>16183227
what do you mean not empirical? they used images to give a range of possibilities, but the point still being that soil erosion is much bigger than previously thought even with the relatively wide range

[Anonymous No.16183238]

>>16183215
It's almost admirably bold of them

[Anonymous No.16183239]

>>16183222
>chatgpt, shorten this to one sentence

[Anonymous No.16183243]

kek

[Anonymous No.16183249]

[Anonymous No.16183252]

>>16183233
>>16183243
>>16183249
ONE OF US
THEY KILLED OUR BROTHER

[Anonymous No.16183259]

[Anonymous No.16183260]

>>16183249
I wonder what was between the f and the k. I guess we'll never know now.

[Anonymous No.16183262]

>>16183259
anon....

[Anonymous No.16183264]

pt 2

[Anonymous No.16183268]

>>16183249
>>16183264
Lad went postal. Airmail, if you will.

[Anonymous No.16183273]

>>16183249
Pour one out for a brother. F.

[Anonymous No.16183274]

>>16183262
I know it's fake I'm showing the huge viewercount

[Anonymous No.16183276]

>>16183249
>>16183264
>I KILLED MYSELF! I AM SILLY!
kek terrible fake

[Anonymous No.16183277]

>>16183274
You have no idea how bad it is. Internet is filled with bots.

[Anonymous No.16183284]

>>16183277
I donate to EFF, use VPNs, big on encryption rights, etc, but sometimes I think like.... damn, we should have an internet2 where everyone is a real person and you need like a biometric scan or some shit to post anything at all.

[Anonymous No.16183296]

https://www.youtube.com/live/KBILvoZD2xI
128k views!

[Anonymous No.16183297]

>>16183099
locally flat, you start to notice it if you do anything larger than about a mile and a half

[Anonymous No.16183299]

>>16183187
I really like Dr. Phil but I think he's lost in his own data and seeing ghosts

[Anonymous No.16183301]

>>16183099
Yes

[Anonymous No.16183317]

>>16183264
>>16183249
Oh yes very convincing

[Anonymous No.16183324]

https://x.com/SawyerMerritt/status/1792212802398244961

[Anonymous No.16183325]

>>16183324

[Anonymous No.16183349]

>>16183264
>>16183249
Lmao who is gonna believe this shit

[Anonymous No.16183353]

>>16183099
No, it is covered with many hills and valleys.

[Anonymous No.16183359]

>>16183325
I wonder how many people those two guys have killed. More than zero and less than 100, I guess.

[Anonymous No.16183363]

>>16183353
Isaacman BTFO. Common NASA W.

[Anonymous No.16183365]

>>16183363
Why is spaceguy5 (Nasa employee) making antisemetic remarks on X? I think I'll report this to his employer

[Anonymous No.16183366]

>>16183363
>Fuck space unless my team is doing it at a glacial pace!

[Anonymous No.16183375]

>>16183363
Of course

[Anonymous No.16183379]

https://x.com/blueorigin/status/1792309251727118539

[Anonymous No.16183380]

>>16183363
>Roman telescope
Does he mean the Nancy Grace Roman space telescope? The NGR telescope?

[Anonymous No.16183383]

>>16183379
wow, falling like a retard for a few seconds inside a small metal box with some other retards must really be life changing, especially being in Earth's atmosphere the whole time

[Anonymous No.16183387]

>>16183379
Bang Ding Ow

[Anonymous No.16183393]

https://x.com/cb_doge/status/1792136834195259746

[Anonymous No.16183399]

>>16183363
Sneeding

[Anonymous No.16183400]

>>16183383
i wonder if the sorta guys who want to spend millions to ride on new shep just tend to be guys who are desperate for some sorta spiritual fulfillment so they'll just feel like flying around for 10 minutes is a life-changing experience no matter what. on the other hand, shatner was the only one who seemed to voice any profound thoughts about it and he just got invited on.

[Anonymous No.16183407]

no fucking news today god damn it. stuck here looking at these dumb fucks on new shephard for news and we cant even get starbase movements.

[Anonymous No.16183411]

>>16183407
Go down to Starbase right fucking now and quit your bitching.

[Anonymous No.16183416]

Checking in here. So you Mayfags were all wrong? As always? Whenwill youlearn to take SpceX claims witha grain of salt?

[Anonymous No.16183420]

>>16183416
*marchfags I mean

[Anonymous No.16183421]

>>16183407
Here you go, buddy
https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1792279497925898539

[Anonymous No.16183422]

>>16182311
FTL travel requires the power collected by a Dyson sphere

[Anonymous No.16183425]

>>16183416
NASA is constantly lying. Why are you focused only on SpaceX.

[Anonymous No.16183432]

>>16183425
the thing is noone beleives nasa but yallw ere parroting may like your life depended on it

[Anonymous No.16183443]

>>16182741
>>16182764
>suborbital tourism is back
that took awhile, glad to see that its back

>chute failure
-ACK

[Anonymous No.16183447]

>>16183400
Yeah, there's also some degree of cognitive dissonance. "I paid millions of dollars for this. It can't just be some stupid carnival ride. That would mean I'm a sucker. I'm not a sucker. I'm a successful businessman. This must be worth what I paid for it."

[Anonymous No.16183459]

>>16183379
Wa was wee wah I paid millions of dollars for a auborbital carnival ride I am overview effecting so hard right now

[Anonymous No.16183469]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soaK296a2XM

[Anonymous No.16183480]

*ignores*

[Anonymous No.16183481]

>>16183469
No.

[Anonymous No.16183493]

>>16183469
nice titties

[Anonymous No.16183500]

>>16183469
Why does this 100% white bitch wear braids like a nigger. Not an ounce of melanin in that skin

[Anonymous No.16183507]

>>16183500
If you look closely, you will notice that she's not actually white.

[Anonymous No.16183511]

Did those people taking that rocket ride get hurt? It looked like the capsule landed pretty fast.

[Anonymous No.16183521]

>>16183469
>woman talking for an hour
I ain't listening to that.

[Anonymous No.16183531]

https://x.com/wapodavenport/status/1792339048192999656

[Anonymous No.16183533]

https://x.com/CJHandmer/status/1792334587554861400

lol tory blocked handmer after the latter criticized torys posting of the misleading ULA graphics (yet again)

[Anonymous No.16183539]

>>16183533
lying snake

[Anonymous No.16183542]

>>16183531
sometimes after an accident it takes a while for your adrenalin to lessen and that is when the neck/back strain or other injuries become apparent, these people need to go to an emergency room right away and get checked, they need to get Bezos' insurance info too.

[Anonymous No.16183546]

https://x.com/torybruno/status/1792304235565998156

he just keeps posting these

[Anonymous No.16183547]

Now that the dust has settled, what would Bezos have done if none of the chutes opened?

[Anonymous No.16183554]

>>16183531
so a guy who works for the Washington Post said that the rocket owned by the guy who owns the Washington Post is really successful
very cool

[Anonymous No.16183556]

>>16183547
gone into hiding

[Anonymous No.16183563]

>>16183546
doesnt even want to directly mention or show it kek. cant even make the outline starship jsut makes it anomalous rocket #34928374

[Anonymous No.16183567]

>>16183533
I would love to know how Tory thinks he's ever going to build all that in situ fueling architecture with his expendable rockets

[Anonymous No.16183572]

>>16183407
just go to the fucking beach and take a picture of a fumo next to Starship

[Anonymous No.16183575]

>>16183572
im not a faggot sorry

[Anonymous No.16183576]

>>16183546

[Anonymous No.16183580]

>>16183546
Notice how themegaconstellationoptimized rocket can do 40T to LEO. Tory was bang on the money with Starship LOL

[Anonymous No.16183581]

>>16183567
It's quite simple

[Anonymous No.16183582]

>>16183547
Activated his jeet online defence force to whataboutism about SpaceX

[Anonymous No.16183585]

>>16183400
>shatner was the only one who seemed to voice any profound thoughts about it
Yeah and Bezos kept talking over him and hosing him down with champagne. Bezos is such an ass.

[Anonymous No.16183589]

>>16181383
There's also the odd infrared signatures from Tabby's Star, as well as several similar stars physically close to Tabby's Star.
There's also that stray laser signal from Tabby's Star.

[Anonymous No.16183590]

>>16183575
you say you're not a faggot and yet you do not own a fumo
curious

[Anonymous No.16183598]

so what dark deal did elon have to make to get indonesia to accept starlink?

[Anonymous No.16183608]

>>16183598
Blackmail video of him fucking an 8 year old, the usual stuff.

[Anonymous No.16183612]

>>16183608
you're confusing Indonesia with another great ally of ours

[Anonymous No.16183615]

>>16183608
Elon has an impregnation fetish though. Cant do that to an 8 year old so he couldnt get hard.

[Anonymous No.16183616]

>>16183612
Nah it's for all rich people

[Anonymous No.16183620]

>>16183598
SpaceX has a functional constellation is all. If China had its G60 constellation started there might have been something resembling a completion.

[Anonymous No.16183621]

>>16183590
so are elon and shotwell faggots. they do not own fumos and you cant say otherwise

[Anonymous No.16183623]

>>16183621
Elon has a fumo

[Anonymous No.16183625]

>>16183380
NGRST rules the skies

[Anonymous No.16183626]

>>16183623
False and you have no proof. And no statement was made on Shotwell, which means you think Shotwell is a faggot. That makes you a NASA tranny, fuck right off.

[Anonymous No.16183628]

>>16183626
nigger

[Anonymous No.16183631]

>>16183628
Knew it, fumotard proven to be spacegoy5 go back to rekkit.

[Anonymous No.16183641]

>>16183363
literally the biggest butt-fucking faggot ever, hands down. At this point i’m wondering if it’s just trollling / engagement bait for personal entertainment. No way someone has EDS THIS badly

[Anonymous No.16183648]

>>16183641
>No way someone has EDS THIS badly

Yeah, they do man

[Anonymous No.16183669]

What would you put as the equivalent in /sfg/? I would personally say its EDS posters

[Anonymous No.16183676]

>>16183669
there's also a host of unmentionable, frequently avatared pieces of garbage and v-tumors

[Anonymous No.16183690]

>>16183676
choke on it lol

[Anonymous No.16183697]

>>16183363
Hello for american anons can you please report this guy to nasa
He is breaking every pr rule they have
Plus i heard he shares info to his friends

[Anonymous No.16183699]

>>16183697
Current NASA admin is a Biden boy. So he's antiSpaceX

[Anonymous No.16183701]

>>16183576
I love this smug bitch and need her to step on me

[Anonymous No.16183702]

>>16183697
pretty sure others have reported him about his sec ops already. if you give me the easiest way to contact them about this i will, but you can probably just send an email to them about this yourself as a european. see picrel and website linked. https://www.nasa.gov/cybersecurity-policies/

[Anonymous No.16183713]

>>16183531
Why isn't it being investigated as a mishap?

[Anonymous No.16183714]

>>16183713
they paid off the FAA

[Anonymous No.16183719]

https://twitter.com/raz_liu/status/1792071047258451990
>According to the latest interview. It will be 10 pads each for the liquid & solid rockets in the future along the coastline of Wenchang.

China's planning on building it's own Missile Row

[Anonymous No.16183740]

>>16183713
Probably because it's part of the usual redundancy and the mission was completed as planned. Was the Dragon non-deployment investigated as a mishap by the FAA? I don't remember.

[Anonymous No.16183745]

>>16183719
your picture says they might build 10 liquid rocket pads

[Anonymous No.16183748]

>>16183745
Does this other picture say that they might also build 10 solid rocket pads?

[Anonymous No.16183749]

>>16183748
not exactly, but close enough
kek

[Anonymous No.16183751]

>>16183749
>close enough
What does that mean, they're going to be for hybrid rockets?

[Anonymous No.16183753]

>>16183748
>>16183751
It just says "10 solid rocket stations" but there's no verb.
Presumably someone said the first bit about the liquid rockets and then the bit about the solid rockets.

[Anonymous No.16183815]

>>16183749
Why did jannies clean this up. Can't they clean up the trannies instead.

[Anonymous No.16183822]

https://x.com/JerryPikePhoto/status/1792279771658760240

F9 Booster shot closeup

[Anonymous No.16183823]

>>16183815
he obviously deleted it himself dork

[Anonymous No.16183828]

>>16183697
lol crying to NASA to shut him up?
pathetic
the true chad way is BTFOing him in an internet argument

[Anonymous No.16183833]

>>16183828
>moves goalposts
>whatabouts you
>blocks you

Etc... You can't "win" with these "people". They are ideologically entrenched.

[Anonymous No.16183860]

>>16183833
Shut up faggot

[Anonymous No.16183867]

>>16183860
That's what arguing with sg5 is like, though. I'm not sure he's admitted that nobody could possibly have been hurt during the LN2 test tank pop yet and that's just one example.

[Anonymous No.16183894]

>>16183860
Afraid of people reporting you spaceguy5?

[Anonymous No.16183928]

>>16183894
Go shag your nan you mutton headed twat

[Anonymous No.16183993]

>>16183928
Settle down spaceguy5

[Anonymous No.16184001]

>>16183641
CSS and ESGhound were much worse

[Anonymous No.16184007]

>>16184001
Were. ESGHound faded in to irrelevancy and CSS is currently undergoing that same process with sg5 rising in the rankings. Lightningl3g is, ofcourse, eternally #1 in the EDS baiter community forever.

[Anonymous No.16184022]

lunch?

[Anonymous No.16184038]

>>16184022
döner

[Anonymous No.16184041]

>>16184038
Břųķfīšť

[Anonymous No.16184042]

Would Boeing sell me a CST-Starliner-mobile if I asked? Im actually in the market for exactly this trim

[Anonymous No.16184045]

>>16184042
No and youre to poor anyways

[Anonymous No.16184046]

>>16184045
why would you say that?

[Anonymous No.16184065]

>>16183249
based schizo

[Anonymous No.16184077]

Again, not making any threads until we have another situation with the OPs again so someone else has to stage. Page 10 is only two posts away.

[Anonymous No.16184080]

>>16184007
What about CSI Starbase
He's always positing doomer scenarios which fail to eventuate

[Anonymous No.16184081]

>>16184042
Sure, that will be twenty million dollars plus tip

[Anonymous No.16184082]

The clustering on those Dyson Sphere candidates is somewhat concerning. There are a few hundred thousand stars within 900 light years of Earth, but that's an order of magnitude short of the 5 million objects surveyed. The relatively short range implies that these candidate objects are very common in the cosmos, or they're actually clustered, which suggests a common origin.

[Anonymous No.16184086]

>>16184080
Blatantly false info, people just dog him for fun here because he made one wrong prediction after an IFT and hes black. Hes literally an NSF tier SpaceX fan, and has good videos. Only newfags who are trying to fit in and dont have a clue about anything would take those seriously. Do you maybe have something youd like to tell us??

[Anonymous No.16184090]

>>16184082
Idk much about astrophysics but couldn't they be occluded by accretion discs? Or perhaps large amounts of asteroids?

[Anonymous No.16184099]

>>16184090
They're old red dwarfs which don't usually have those.

[Anonymous No.16184100]

>>16184082
The common origin is Earth. We're not the first human civilization to arise here.

[Anonymous No.16184109]

>>16184042
most reliable vehicle in the Starliner architecture

[Anonymous No.16184112]

>>16184100
Where are the ancient aryan aliens then

[Anonymous No.16184114]

>>16184100
humans or8ginated from the Pleiades thousands of years ago and colonized 2 other systems there. the settled Mars, but sometging went wrong (a great war perhaps). we still have monuments and pyramids on mars today. the surbivors fled to Earth and rebooted covilization, but a biblical deluge set us back yet again.

[Anonymous No.16184115]

Someone bake a new thread, maybe about the new tower piece that got transported or some cool concept station/colony/ship idk.

[Anonymous No.16184116]

[Anonymous No.16184120]

Someone make a new thread with an original idea instead of a fucking NSF update

[Anonymous No.16184123]

>>16184120
No idea here is original nitwit. Unless you want me to draw a dick shaped ship that uses piss as fuel in Solidworks.

[Anonymous No.16184124]

>>16184123
>>16184120
AND IF YOU WANT THAT WHY DONT YOU BAKE THEN HUH??? YOU MUST HAVE SO MANY GOOD IDEAS FOR THREADS RIGHT?? JUST MAKE THEM THEN

[Anonymous No.16184125]

>>16184124
how bout "fuck boeing" edition with a gif of starliner on fire

[Anonymous No.16184128]

>>16184125
Sure go ahead and make that sounds like a good thread to me.

[Anonymous No.16184132]

>>16184112
Dyson spheres

[Anonymous No.16184134]

>>16184128
can you make it?

[Anonymous No.16184136]

>>16184123
Just use a picture of Von Braun, everyone likes Von Braun edition.

[Anonymous No.16184138]

>>16184134
No I literally at the beginning of the thread swore off making OPs since you all bitch so much about them. You make it.

[Anonymous No.16184141]

>>16183719
i think it was decided years ago to turn wenchang into china's own cape canaveral/ksc

[Anonymous No.16184145]

>>16184136
I swore off making OPs go to top of thread. Im going to sleep anyways now so thats one less person to bake (not like I wouldve anyways). Thread will probably be off the catty if nobody stages by the time I wake up.

[Anonymous No.16184148]

Staging

>>16184146
>>16184146
>>16184146

[Anonymous No.16184152]

>>16184145

[Anonymous No.16184394]

>>16183860
>>16183828
>>16183928
t. mlpedoguy5

[Anonymous No.16184466]

>>16182229
magic of taxation
there's no economical reason to go to space, all of it exists subsidy, if it dried up, we'd only be launching atmospheric sounding rockets.

[Anonymous No.16184724]

>>16181413
>He wants to live in the pod

[Anonymous No.16184780]

>>16183393
Finally Kaela can have good internet

[Anonymous No.16184802]

>>16183576
SEGGS NOW